Almost never will it need to go back more than several decades. Rarely will the perspective need to go back more than a few years. Not spending the time necessary to learn how to read and write can then be dedicated to pursuing a person's passion so they can get ahead.Īlso, why do people have to learn about history? Occasionally things in people's lives can be better understood when viewed from a historical perspective. Occasionally, people may encounter things they must read that are not electronic or be forced to write something without the use of a modern computer, but just learning some basic phonetics should be sufficient for those times you have to read and recording yourself a voice message on your phone should each be sufficient until you can get to a computer to have it do the rest. We have computers and programs that can type out what we say and can also read to us what other people write. Learning to read and write are basically useless skills now. Let's apply your argument to things other than math and see if it still seems valid. I could have spent that time learning real, useful skills solving real problems learning about real issues.Īgree or disagree? And, what is the highest level of math that you think should be required for students in general? It was fun, like a puzzle, and I enjoyed being good at it. Deleting unnecessary math from the curriculum would help students to move forward, not hold them back.ĭon't get me wrong I loved math. Moreover, forgoing unnecessary math frees students to pursue their passions more completely so that they can "get ahead" in life. Indeed, there is no better way to learn math. Those with the aptitude and passion will by default pursue those projects and subjects which are meaningful to them-be it astronomy, physics, epidemiology, etc.-and in the event that advanced math becomes necessary in those pursuits, they could not be better placed to fully understand and appreciate the value of that math than from within the contexts in which it is actually meaningful and useful. One could argue that the person will be too far behind at that point, but that argument doesn't quite hold up. And if ever the real-world problems a person encounters in life require it, a person can learn some calculus if they so choose. Almost never will it involve anything more advanced than that. Occasionally, solving real-world problems will involve some math.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |